Thirty2 Degrees

his critical ability to knowledge itself at all times. (3) Another very serious injury against the autonomy of the new Education Act, is contained in paragraph 3 of the aforementioned article 34. which specifies in relation to the choice of the University authorities the following: choose and appoint their authorities based on participatory democracy, leading role and mandate revocable, to the full exercise and in equality of conditions of the political rights of the people of the University community: teachers, professors, students, administrative staff, workers, graduates and egresadas workers. A Council should be elected Comptroller consisting of the members of the University community.In effect, the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in its article 109, defined the University community when he says: the State will recognize University autonomy as a principle and hierarchy that allows teachers, professors, students, estudiantas, graduates and graduates of their community, devote to the pursuit of knowledge through scientific, technological and humanistic research, for spiritual benefit and material of the nation… This constitutional provision sought to be modified in the reform of our Magna Carta, submitted for consideration by the people of Venezuela on December 2 for the year 2007. The reform Article 109 which was presented to the nation was as follows: the law shall ensure the joint vote of students and the students, teachers and professors, workers and University workers to elect authorities; He will consecrate the right of suffrage to all the teachers who have entered for competition, from the rank of instructor or instructor up to holder and establish the standards for University elections are decided in a single round. The reform in its entirety was denied on December 2 of the year 2007 by the people and therefore as such reform was rejected, is necessary to continue to apply article 109 of the Constitution and the University community will be integrated in the manner provided in this rule because one through an organic law can not modify the text of a constitutional provision.Therefore, when the National Assembly placed them in the new organic law of education not only is in contravention of the vote popular, what constitutes a sign of barbarism and thus, reprehensible and immoral action, but that such action is also absolutely unconstitutional.